Every review below was left by someone who paid for an order, collected after delivery. We do not filter, edit or reward reviews, and we publish the one-star ones alongside the rest — the distribution is right here.
4.9
out of 5
7,487 verified reviews
collected after delivery
Distribution across all ratings, rounded to the nearest whole percent, for reviews collected in the last 24 months.
Collected after delivery from every customer, published unedited — the one-star ratings included.
Post-delivery ratings
4.9
3,412 ratings
Revision experience
4.8
2,167 ratings
Support experience
4.9
1,908 ratings
Browse with the arrows, the dots or your keyboard. Nothing here has been trimmed for flattery.
Review 1 of 11
Sorted as they arrived. Each one names the service used.
“I sent the brief at midnight and had a complete, expert-written solution with Harvard referencing by lunchtime. The marker's note explaining why each section met the criteria taught me more than three weeks of lectures.”
Amara O.
MSc Marketing, University of Leeds
Assignment Help ·
“OSCOLA footnoting is where I always lost marks. My expert rebuilt the citations, showed me exactly which authorities carried the argument, and turned the whole problem question around in eighteen hours.”
Callum R.
LLB Law, University of Bristol
Essay Writing ·
“The methodology chapter had defeated me for two months. StudyLaunch Global delivered it in five days with the sampling strategy properly justified, and my supervisor's only comment was to tighten one paragraph.”
Priya S.
MSc Public Health, King's College London
Dissertation & Thesis ·
“The Python project arrived with unit tests, a README and a walkthrough document. I rehearsed my demo against the complexity analysis and answered every question the demonstrator threw at me.”
Tomás L.
BSc Computer Science, University of Manchester
Programming & Data ·
“The Five Forces diagnosis was sharp and the costed recommendations were genuinely usable. I asked for one revision to expand the implementation timeline and it came back within a day.”
Rebecca H.
MBA, Warwick Business School
Case Study Analysis ·
“My reflective portfolio was all description and no reflection. The editor restructured it around Gibbs, kept my own voice and flagged in tracked changes exactly where I needed to go deeper.”
Jia Wen T.
BSc Nursing, University of Nottingham
Editing & Proofreading ·
“Load takedowns to Eurocode 2, every assumption stated, and the section checks laid out so I could follow the logic. The calculation workings alone were worth the fee for revision.”
Oliver B.
BEng Civil Engineering, University of Sheffield
Coursework & Reports ·
“What impressed me was the annotated bibliography. Every source came with a line explaining why it earned its place, which sent me back to the archive material with an actual argument in mind.”
Daniel M.
BA History, University of Glasgow
Essay Writing ·
“The consolidation workings arrived in Excel so I could trace every eliminating entry myself. It needed one revision to match my module's IFRS 16 treatment, which was handled without any fuss.”
Zainab K.
MSc Accounting & Finance, University of Birmingham
Assignment Help ·
“I commissioned only the discussion chapter. My analyst read the whole thesis first, connected the findings back to my attachment framework, and prepared a viva brief anticipating six examiner questions.”
Ethan P.
PhD Psychology, University of York
Dissertation & Thesis ·
“Overnight turnaround on a 1,500-word case analysis, delivered with a Turnitin report attached. I used it as a worked reference for my own submission and finally understood how an evidence table works.”
Sofia G.
BA Business Management, University of Exeter
Case Study Analysis ·
Seven days after an order is delivered, every customer is invited to rate the work and leave feedback. We ask everyone, not a hand-picked subset, and we ask whether the order went well or badly. There is no second reminder and no incentive: no discount, no credit, no prize draw. Paying for reviews would make them worthless to you and to us.
The reviews reproduced on this page are published verbatim as they were left, with only two changes: surnames are reduced to a first name for privacy, and identifying module codes are removed at the reviewer’s request. We do not alter wording, fix typographical errors or shorten criticism. Our overall score is 4.9 out of 5 and roughly two per cent of reviews are one or two stars — they are published alongside the rest.
When a review raises a genuine problem, our student support lead responds privately by email, and the order is re-examined by a senior subject reviewer. That is the only response a negative review gets from us. Criticism stays published.
Send us your brief and find out whether the score holds up. Quotes are free, the subject expert who writes your work is named before you pay, and revisions stay free for 30 days.